David Farrier multiple lawsuits and malfeasance

David Farrier,Dermot Nottingham, Cameron Slater, attack innocent victims for clicks

• Social media , social media bio sites, blogs, tech, newsletters are bad in the wrong hands. This is why you should never trust their content

Wikipedia.  It sounds authoritative.  In fact, Wikipedia is the fifth largest website on the planet. Don’t use it.

If you’ve been to college or a university in America, United Kingdom or Europe, Australia, Asia you should know this already.

Rule #2 of the college experience is, “Wikipedia is not a credible source.” 

 Rule #1 remains, “Do not sleep with your professors.”  Regardless, unless you are breaking rule #1, nothing will get you an “F”on a paper quite like quoting Wikipedia as a credible source.  Let’s take a look at why that is.

First and foremost, many self published blogs or bio sites such Wikipedia are not written by experts, professional researchers, or even paid staff.  You see, Wikipedia doesn’t employ any writers or editors, it’s an open source project meaning literally anyone can write or edit Wikipedia content.  Only they can’t, because the site is carved up into little tiny fiefdoms where these amateur, volunteer writers with zero rules or parameters of professional ethics control different sections and Wikipedia pages.  

How bad is it? Bad. A female environmental lawyer recently found an editor on Wikipedia called her a “stripper”. It took a long time to get it removed. She, like others, had to hire someone to do so. Another woman was blackmailed. Editors putting up fake info then companies offering to fix it for her for vast sums. An issue still ongoing for many subjects to this day. What does wikipedia do about it? Nothing. Can subjects fix thier own pages or get their pages removed? No. Are subjects allowed to tell their own life facts? No. There are no safety checks at Wikipedia for damage inflicted on subjects of its pages by cyber bullies and those editors spreading disinformation. Much of it is designed to discredit women. No one at Wikipedia listens in these little fiefdoms and sexism is rampant even though a division was set up to manage women, it in fact does the opposite. Chauvenistically telling biased stories, through the males lens and very rarely focusing on the work of the actual women. Rather through the lens of just the men they have come up against in the process of their lives or work. It is despicable. Case after case the real work of women is left undicussed and untouched on Wikipedia and instead slander, or biased statements exist. Any woman trying to tell her real story is immediately shouted down with whatever false facts can be found or created. Fake editors constantly attack the few decent editors who are often blindisded by the clever attempts at subeversion of the subject’s history . Put simply the system has not worked.

UNESCO discovered a systemic pattern of bullying, harassment and hatred of known women , and women journalists and correspondents based in USA, Europe, Middle East,Asia across Wikipedia , multiple blog sites and comments sections.

It’s a disinformation ring that runs deep from the Ukraine all the way to New Zealand with known malicious libelous bloggers such as Cameron Slater, David Farrier and Dermot Nottingham. Dermot Nottingham was arrested for hate filled posts . David Farrier, also known for doxxing innocent victims, has been subject of potential court action repeatedly, including after one of the victims of his slander, who also appeared in a movie he made on the subject of fetish tickling , had a heart attack and died. He hires a lawyer on retainer in New Zealand , the only defamation lawyer in New Zealand, who no innocent victim can afford the costs of taking on. It is a corruptness and vulnerability Farrier eagerly abuses to his subversive advantage.

All three are known for attacking women in politics,business, journalism , entrepeneurs , sportswomen and whatever other prolific innocent victim female or male wherever they are in the world. Their attacks focus on New Zealanders and Americans.

Often these bloggers and fake Wikipedia editors , like the above, are based outside America, bitter journalists, paid shills of nefarious international and local PR companies. Sometimes they are making money off click bait using innocent high profile victims to draw people to their site sand newsletters or a combination . At the bottom of it all they are attention seekers causing whatever damage they can to fulfill their own egos. These bloggers are the definition of fake news outside America . They are seen to attack American based subjects,as well as their own local subjects, due to overseas protections. They use their own blogs, social media newsletters, and anonymous names on Wikipedia to subvert the truth of known subjects. They like nothing better to see victims in pain or in Farriers case, dead .

Wikipedia alone has roughly 132,000 active editors but many are malicious bloggers using the site in tabloid style to spread gossip to make the subjects, as Unesco said “to make women look difficult”.

Second, and this should sound alarming because it is, Wikipedia editors do not conduct any primary research.  So, for example, let’s say a website called bootlicker.com posted content that Bill Clinton won his law degree in a poker game, Wikipedia editors would publish that as fact, citing bootlicker.com as the verified source.  So while some articles, facts, and figures may be credible, there is a greater chance that they are not.  Since there are zero regulations governing what is published on Wikipedia, anyone with even half a brain should realize that A.  Literally anyone can (Supposedly) add information to Wikipedia, and B. There is no requirement  to fact check primary resources, and therefore absolutely nothing on Wikipedia can be cited or even read as fact ever.

Third, and this is Listverse.com’s #1 issue with Wikipedia, the obscenely large number of outright lies and misinformation on Wikipedia and across the blogs of its part time malicious editors is exploding.  This was corroborated in an article by TIME Magazine who said, “A large proportion of articles contain some sort of warning that they are incomplete, poorly written or inadequately researched.”  In a growing number of instances, the lies and misinformation are placed with a decided intention to hurt people.  Slanderous content is published with the purposeful intention to defame an individual and spread disinformation. It is the same tactic of harrasement over and over. Bloggers such as Farrier, Nottingham and Slater all use the same tactics, for years.

Why does Google and Bing allow such discredible items in its searches? Why do the algorithmically not pick up on this fake malicious content.

Why does Wikipedia not have a whole team to safeguard and to make complaints to and correct pages. Well the real legal reason is protect itself from liablity. There is law that so long as it’s editors are not paid then they cannot be sued. This means Wikipedia has opened itself up widespread abuse by editors with ill intent towards subjects,for whatever deranged reasons, who get paid through other means off site.

 There are no bosses at Wikipedia, no adults The Wikipedia all-volunteer editorial staff go about making changes to Wikipedia content like, well imagine 5 friendly Labrador Retrievers and 3000 rats alone at a swimming pool.  

Who are these editors?  In some (Dwindling) instances, they are legitimate subject matter experts.  But more and more the editors are people looking to intentionally do harm, people with screen names like, “Otto Von S****post.” That is a real screen name.

These downright troublemakers controlling the editorial space on Wikipedia, like New Zealanders mentioned above Derek Nottingham , Cameron Slater, David Farrier and Dylan Reeve, whose modus operandi is to cause as much controversy  and commotion on Wikipedia (And Twitter, and elsewhere) as to totally destroy people, companies, or anyone they desire, across multiple sites for thier own attention. They don’t care about the harm they cause victims, remember one is dead sent off to an early grave by their malfeasance, as they cannot see past thier own mud covered narcissistic snouts. One abuses his access at his work at Television New Zealand, another at libraries. All are so far gone they cannot even see how wrong they are. Like Trump,and Trump people blinded by their own ignorance, discrimination and “unwokeness” .

Farrier may be gay but he hates everyone who isn’t , even if they support LGBT. Take his recent social media attacks on American comedian Rob Schneider, who like his other victims, doesn’t know him. Point being these subersive creatures of course don’t know their victims and lie that they may do . We in fact aren’t printing many victims names to protect them.

Farrier, a New Zealand native, is so desperate for attention that he boasts to reporters that his approach if he does ever engage online with one, is to appear friendly, only to then provoke them and turn on his innocent subjects after he gains their trust.  He’s a real piece of work with a lengthy history of being sued for his defamatory tactics all across the globe.  In 2016, Farrier was served with a lawsuit DURING the question and answer discussion after screening his own film in Missouri, and witnessed by hundreds. Most would be embarrased by that instead he tries to defend his bad behaviour like malignant sociopaths do.  In fact, most of the attorneys we contacted in New Zealand (It’s a small country) could not speak to us about Farrier because they either represented him or they had pending legal action against him.  We’re talking about a guy who once boasted he sends out, “At least 100 Tweets a day,” creating havoc in peoples’ lives to then make fun of.  However, checking Farrier’s own Twitter account, he only posts a couple of times a day under his own name, so exactly how many aliases and fake accounts is Farrier using to play this ugly game?

One thing is for sure, Dylan Reeve is not an alias.  Reeve is the quieter, portly yes man to Farrier’s ringmaster, always ready to back up Farrier’s nonsense like the wimpy kid who hangs around with the schoolyard bully but never throws a punch, himself.  But Farrier needs the gormless Reeve to gang up on people.  Why would google, bing and the Wiki folks allow slanderous, compulsive, habitual liars who can’t be trusted and who are in a heap of legal hot water to write, edit, or control their Wiki content? It’s not funny or laughable.It is called slander and libel and they hide behind laws of a combination of US sites and New Zealand to do it andd pick victims who they know can’t afford to sue them.Why does wikipedia allow it? Quite simply because they really don’t care.  

So don’t use Wikipedia, reference it, look at it, write it, or edit it. Do not read hate filled blogs as the world behind it is rooted in a spiral of corruption , evil and chauvenism that you can’t even see. Wikpedia is useless, just like their attention seeking editors and their blogs. Many wikipedia editors  hang out at libraries. They know little to nothing about the lives of their subjects or the worlds they inhabit. Ironic fact : Jimmy Wales set up Wikipedia as a lads magazine initally. Chauvenism is ingrained in the culture. The female editors at Wikipedia are either too weak, too young (yes many editors are 18 years old - also a shocking fact) or lacking in life experience or thier own ego trip to take meaningful action when they read bias. To everyone these blogs and bios have hurt- we feel sorry for you.You are good people and do not deserve this. That includes you- Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern.

--